<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>floorcoveringinspections.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog</link>
	<description>Floor Covering Inspections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hardwood Moisture Surppresant System Failure</title>
		<link>http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog/hardwood-moisture-surppresant-system-failure.php/</link>
		<comments>http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog/hardwood-moisture-surppresant-system-failure.php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vince</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Floorcovering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture surppresant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General/Site information I was commissioned by a client to inspect the Hardwood flooring failure in an upscale Resort. The issue is cupping. The structure was built within the last 2 years and supposedly every effort was made to avoid this type of failure. The contractor/builder chose to install a quality moisture suppressant system in place [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>General/Site information</strong><br />
I was commissioned by a client to inspect the Hardwood flooring failure in an upscale Resort.<br />
The issue is cupping. The structure was built within the last 2 years and supposedly every<br />
effort was made to avoid this type of failure.</p>
<p>The contractor/builder chose to install a quality moisture suppressant system in place of a<br />
vapor barrier under the concrete when the concrete was poured. The flooring was installed<br />
approximately 8 months after the concrete pour. Accurate information regarding the ambient<br />
temperature, ambient relative humidity, concrete moisture test results, and moisture content<br />
of the wood prior, to installation, could not be obtained.</p>
<p><strong>Product Information/Procedure</strong><br />
The concrete received a two part epoxy moisture suppressant system followed by gluing with<br />
the recommended adhesive for installing 4’ by 4’ CDX panels. Each panel was nailed with<br />
1.5 inch shot pins in each corner and one pin slightly off center in the middle of each plywood<br />
panel. Lastly, the hardwood was both glued and nailed to the CDX panels.</p>
<p>The flooring is a 3/4 inch solid oak, 6” wide x random lengths to 74” with beveled edges<br />
&amp; ends, factory finished, installed over 3/4 inch CDX plywood cut into 4’ by 4’ squares and<br />
grooved every 12 inches on the back (per manufacturers’ recommendations). All vertical<br />
seams were staggered. Seven thousand square feet of Harwood was installed.</p>
<p><strong>Cupping</strong><br />
Several months later the flooring exhibited a cupping condition and has continued to worsen<br />
with time. The question being asked is why is the moisture suppressant system failing?</p>
<p>Moisture Suppressant System Breached<br />
The manufacturer’s instructions did not suggest or recommend to shot nail the CDX panels.</p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong><br />
The above application would void the warranty for the moisture control system for several<br />
reasons. First, shooting two thousand one hundred eighty-five 1-1/2” nails in to the barrier<br />
would create that many points of entry for moisture to wick up through. Second, the flooring<br />
is wider, thicker and in some cases longer than the recommended size of 1/2” thick, 5” wide<br />
and 4 ft. in length. Third, the wrong glue was used because the manufacturer’s adhesive<br />
#4234-or adhesive # 4235 are the required adhesives for installations of solid wood. And<br />
finally, the coverage rate required for solid wood flooring is 250 sq. ft. per gallon, which was<br />
not followed.</p>
<p><strong>Vincent Ferranti</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://floorcoveringinspections.com/blog/hardwood-moisture-surppresant-system-failure.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

